Browse Source

Make sys_arch_sem_wait() & sys_arch_mbox_fetch() a little more robust when waiting (although this should never be a problem...)

STABLE-2_1_x
goldsimon 9 years ago
parent
commit
597d5459bb
  1. 6
      test/unit/arch/sys_arch.c

6
test/unit/arch/sys_arch.c

@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ u32_t sys_arch_sem_wait(sys_sem_t *sem, u32_t timeout)
LWIP_ASSERT("*sem > 0", *sem > 0);
LWIP_ASSERT("expecting a semaphore count but it's 0", !expectSomething || (*sem > 1));
ret++;
if (ret == SYS_ARCH_TIMEOUT) {
ret--;
}
} while(*sem == 1);
}
else
@ -280,6 +283,9 @@ u32_t sys_arch_mbox_fetch(sys_mbox_t *q, void **msg, u32_t timeout)
LWIP_ASSERT("q->used >= 0", q->used >= 0);
LWIP_ASSERT("expecting item available but it's 0", !expectSomething || (q->used > 0));
ret++;
if (ret == SYS_ARCH_TIMEOUT) {
ret--;
}
} while(q->used == 0);
}
else

Loading…
Cancel
Save